| 11/06/26 33 threads archived from literature-posting.bso. Last crawled just now. |
How can we avoid dehumanization in the name of utility and capitalist markets?
Where should I start with Dostoevsky?
Another 100% ai-generated book won a literary award.
How do we stop this?
>>133 (OP)
yoo is this real>>133 (OP)
humanity is doomedAnother 100% ai-generated book won a literary award.
How do we stop this?
>>133 (OP)
yoo is this real>>133 (OP)
humanity is doomedI want to understand why France is the way it is and how it got this way.
George Orwell based or cringe?
>>105 (OP)
I agree with this sentiment
People who listen to audiobooks don't even digest the information. Audiobooks are for niggers that listen to goggins and jocko.
I geuss the one valid use case for audiobooks is if you're a wine mom in a book club.
>>105 (OP)
I agree with this sentiment
People who listen to audiobooks don't even digest the information. Audiobooks are for niggers that listen to goggins and jocko.
I geuss the one valid use case for audiobooks is if you're a wine mom in a book club.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/judgment-and-decision-making/article/bot-or-not-can-people-tell-the-difference-between-stories-written-by-a-human-or-by-an-ai-system/45E6DC0BB90AA648654D5AE243F6C667
>How do people perceive artificial intelligence (AI)-generated fictional stories? In Study 1, participants (1,682 adults recruited from Prolific) read either a human-written or AI-generated story. Half were told that their story was written by a human, and half were told that their story was written by ChatGPT. Participants rated the AI-generated story as higher quality and more absorbing, but they rated the story better on both measures when they were told it was written by a human. In Studies 2 and 3, participants (905 adults recruited from Prolific) read both types of story and guessed each story’s origins. Participants were no better than chance at differentiating between the human-written and AI-generated stories. Self-reported expertise with AI, but not with fictional literatu
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>100 (OP)
nah, fuck ai>>100 (OP)
weneedgoodwriters
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ULHkNLveXZs&ra=mhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/judgment-and-decision-making/article/bot-or-not-can-people-tell-the-difference-between-stories-written-by-a-human-or-by-an-ai-system/45E6DC0BB90AA648654D5AE243F6C667
>How do people perceive artificial intelligence (AI)-generated fictional stories? In Study 1, participants (1,682 adults recruited from Prolific) read either a human-written or AI-generated story. Half were told that their story was written by a human, and half were told that their story was written by ChatGPT. Participants rated the AI-generated story as higher quality and more absorbing, but they rated the story better on both measures when they were told it was written by a human. In Studies 2 and 3, participants (905 adults recruited from Prolific) read both types of story and guessed each story’s origins. Participants were no better than chance at differentiating between the human-written and AI-generated stories. Self-reported expertise with AI, but not with fictional literatu
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>100 (OP)
weneedgoodwriters
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ULHkNLveXZs&ra=m*dies without finishing his books*
Is it worth it leaning Ancient Greek or Latin?
I'll start: Gods Themselves
LeGuin is top sci-fi, though.
>If Lucy had really met a faun—that is, a satyr—the result would have been a rape, not a tea party
t. Tolkien
>If Lucy had really met a faun—that is, a satyr—the result would have been a rape, not a tea party
t. Tolkien