[all / search] [a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic / oc] [r9k / s5s / vip / q] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [trash] [Search] [Home]
Board

BCE instead of BC

/his/ - History & Humanities · history-posting.bso


[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]12 / 0
Return Catalog Bottom

File: yNxjX0M.jpeg (image, 640x480)
You might have noticed this trend. It's prominent in academic journals, some history books, and notably in Wikipedia. The idea is to provide "a neutral way" to label historical dates by replacing Before Christ with Before Common Era. In turn, CE (Common Era) is the alternative to AD (Anno Domini, "in the year of the Lord"). The usual suspects are behind this, under the guise of diversity and inclusivity, to avoid referring to Jesus as Dominus (Lord).
>>
>>32 (OP)
in fact i have seen both in wikipedia, sometimes in the same article, so their jannies arent entirely consistent about it
maybe they will end up using ai to standarize everything with bce/bc
>>
>>33
>bce/bc
i meant bce/ce
>>
Ab urbe condita is the best dating system
>>
>>32 (OP)
Kikepedia articles about judaism, virtually all of them, use BCE/CE, including old testament stuff.
Other than (them), reddit soyence faggots and their followers, useful retards, use those terms. And articles about hindoo stuff use them more often than sandmonkeys and others. I've seen some articles about ancient China, for example, use both BC/CE together -- this is truly a "neutral" way, like referring to °C as Celsius degrees or centigrade, interchangeably, since they're synonyms. But (they) hate his name and anything related to him, and incite changes, and useful retards follow naturally. It's become increasingly common since the beginning of the last decade. Naturally.
I've seen for example in technical specifications from Hong Kong written in traditional Chinese and English the term "year of the Christian era" as a translation to 西元 before the year digits; (they) would never do this, because (they) hate him and anything related to him. The C in the acronym's meaning could be changed to "christian" and the meaning would remain exactly the same, but (they) can't stand his name or anything related to him. It's different from hindoos, sand monkeys and other uncultured swines' opinions, these rarely hate him, in the proper sense of this word.
>>33
>maybe they will end up using ai to standarize
Kill yourself, retarded nigger.
>>
"common" kikery: common core education, communism, common era, (((common lisp))), what else?
>>
>>73
common cold
>>
nah its allright just name change
>>
>>32 (OP)
The detonation of the first nuke is a better date. Anything before it is just old shit.
>>
>>32 (OP)
Both are wrong. Anatoly Fomenko for the win.
The usual suspects were already behind modern chronology. Jesuit Joseph Scalinger and Dyonisius Petavius.
>>
>>202
There are no nukes.
>>
>>205
If you're so confident, plant the American flag in the Red Square.
>>
>>204
>Fomenko
kek
What was this again? That the dark ages were a myth or some shit?

Imagine being so btfo as a culture, that you claim 1000 years of history was 'made up' because your people are so irrelevant. Putin-tier brainbreakage.

image
You might have noticed this trend. It's prominent in academic journals, some history books, and notably in Wikipedia. The idea is to provide "a neutral way" to label historical dates by replacing Before Christ with Before Common Era. In turn, CE (Common Era) is the alternative to AD (Anno Domini, "in the year of the Lord"). The usual suspects are behind this, under the guise of diversity and inclusivity, to avoid referring to Jesus as Dominus (Lord).
>>33>>63>>202>>204
>>32 (OP)
in fact i have seen both in wikipedia, sometimes in the same article, so their jannies arent entirely consistent about it
maybe they will end up using ai to standarize everything with bce/bc
>>34>>63
>>33
>bce/bc
i meant bce/ce
Ab urbe condita is the best dating system
>>32 (OP)
Kikepedia articles about judaism, virtually all of them, use BCE/CE, including old testament stuff.
Other than (them), reddit soyence faggots and their followers, useful retards, use those terms. And articles about hindoo stuff use them more often than sandmonkeys and others. I've seen some articles about ancient China, for example, use both BC/CE together -- this is truly a "neutral" way, like referring to °C as Celsius degrees or centigrade, interchangeably, since they're synonyms. But (they) hate his name and anything related to him, and incite changes, and useful retards follow naturally. It's become increasingly common since the beginning of the last decade. Naturally.
I've seen for example in technical specifications from Hong Kong written in traditional Chinese and English the term "year of the Christian era" as a translation to 西元 before the year digits; (they) would never do this, because (they) hate him and anything related to him. The C in the acronym's meaning could be changed to "christian" and the meaning would remain exactly the same, but (they) can't stand his name or anything related to him. It's different from hindoos, sand monkeys and other uncultured swines' opinions, these rarely hate him, in the proper sense of this word.
>>33
>maybe they will end up using ai to standarize
Kill yourself, retarded nigger.
"common" kikery: common core education, communism, common era, (((common lisp))), what else?
>>74
>>73
common cold
nah its allright just name change
>>32 (OP)
The detonation of the first nuke is a better date. Anything before it is just old shit.
>>205
>>32 (OP)
Both are wrong. Anatoly Fomenko for the win.
The usual suspects were already behind modern chronology. Jesuit Joseph Scalinger and Dyonisius Petavius.
>>207
>>202
There are no nukes.
>>206
>>205
If you're so confident, plant the American flag in the Red Square.
>>204
>Fomenko
kek
What was this again? That the dark ages were a myth or some shit?

Imagine being so btfo as a culture, that you claim 1000 years of history was 'made up' because your people are so irrelevant. Putin-tier brainbreakage.