[all / search] [a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic / oc] [r9k / s5s / vip / q] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [trash] [Search] [Home]
Board

Should I read this?

/his/ - History & Humanities · history-posting.bso


[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]3 / 0
Return Catalog Bottom

File: 1792887839174460.jpg (image, 1200x1702)
Should I read this?
>>
Gibbon is a bit outdated, but his writing and story telling style is very good. Most history writers are so bad, that's why Gibbon is such an interesting reference. You can read him and then read some other books about what changed since then.
>>
>>192
Good point, anon.
>>
>>191 (OP)
Gibbon's based. Definitel read Opinions of historical events go through phases, a bit like fashion. Nobody fucking knows, so just choose your own larp.

His writing style and storytelling is faaaaaaaaaaaaar better than modern slop with an ideological point to prove.

image
Should I read this?
>>196
Gibbon is a bit outdated, but his writing and story telling style is very good. Most history writers are so bad, that's why Gibbon is such an interesting reference. You can read him and then read some other books about what changed since then.
>>193
>>192
Good point, anon.
>>191 (OP)
Gibbon's based. Definitel read Opinions of historical events go through phases, a bit like fashion. Nobody fucking knows, so just choose your own larp.

His writing style and storytelling is faaaaaaaaaaaaar better than modern slop with an ideological point to prove.